Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 16411 for commenting.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 16411 for commenting.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
impermissible comment upon his right against self-incrimination and his right to choose not to present witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26882 - 2006-10-23
impermissible comment upon his right against self-incrimination and his right to choose not to present witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26882 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to “heavy” sleep. Burton bases his argument on the following statement in the comments to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501492 - 2022-03-31
to “heavy” sleep. Burton bases his argument on the following statement in the comments to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501492 - 2022-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and in response to defense counsel’s earlier request, the court commented that, “[w]ith respect to that sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
, and in response to defense counsel’s earlier request, the court commented that, “[w]ith respect to that sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 06, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
information, and if so, whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to, correct or comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
information, and if so, whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to, correct or comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28315 - 2007-03-05
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
Sullivan’s attorney for his comments. Counsel asked the court to consider probation or thirty days or less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
Sullivan’s attorney for his comments. Counsel asked the court to consider probation or thirty days or less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—a comment that “there’s continuing concerns about honesty issues”—is from a review hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101937 - 2017-09-21
—a comment that “there’s continuing concerns about honesty issues”—is from a review hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101937 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to, correct or comment on these arguable inaccuracies, or for failing to seek to adjourn the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28315 - 2014-09-15
to, correct or comment on these arguable inaccuracies, or for failing to seek to adjourn the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
time. ¶4 The court then asked Sullivan’s attorney for his comments. Counsel asked the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
time. ¶4 The court then asked Sullivan’s attorney for his comments. Counsel asked the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
With regard to his curative jury instruction argument, Sexton claims that the prosecutor’s comments during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2805 - 2005-03-31
With regard to his curative jury instruction argument, Sexton claims that the prosecutor’s comments during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
that the prosecutor’s comments during the State’s closing argument encouraged the jury “to employ an erroneous legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19
that the prosecutor’s comments during the State’s closing argument encouraged the jury “to employ an erroneous legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19