Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 15399 for fee.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was to continue and that her fees were to be paid equally by the parties. 3 ¶5 Since the initial 2005 order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179778 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
fees under an indemnification clause of an easement agreement. The Millers argue that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336112 - 2021-02-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
A. Callen $5000 in attorney fees. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Jeffrey and Becky were married on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69509 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to be $306,000 a year; and (2) awarding his now-ex-wife Becky A. Callen $5000 in attorney fees. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69509 - 2011-08-15

[PDF] NOTICE
not preserved for review. It also cross-appeals the award of attorney fees to Kang. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27160 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Charles J. Mueller v. Diana M. Kearns
2 asphalt paving; (4) concluded that late payment fees levied on maintenance fees constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3129 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. It also cross-appeals the award of attorney fees to Kang. We affirm in part and reverse in part.[2] ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27160 - 2006-11-15

[PDF] WI APP 34
mandatory surcharges and court fees. Bryson’s argument is based on language in his judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538815 - 2022-08-10

Charles J. Mueller v. Diana M. Kearns
easement; (3) denied her claim to present payment for asphalt paving; (4) concluded that late payment fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3129 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Melvin George v. Donald Kelbach
to provide discovery; and (3) the Kelbachs were not entitled to $100 in attorney’s fees under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20991 - 2017-09-21