Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 19877 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 1581 - 1590 of 19877 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
[PDF]
Ozga Enterprises, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
or procedural due process violation, or under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Finally, the initial complaint was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7797 - 2017-09-19
or procedural due process violation, or under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Finally, the initial complaint was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7797 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Scott E. Pocius v. Kenosha County
him damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), for the alleged due process violations. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14747 - 2017-09-21
him damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), for the alleged due process violations. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14747 - 2017-09-21
Scott E. Pocius v. Kenosha County
the trial court to void the tax deed and to award him damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14747 - 2005-03-31
the trial court to void the tax deed and to award him damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
U.S.C. § 1983. The City moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31470 - 2014-09-15
U.S.C. § 1983. The City moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31470 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
), as a defendant and asserting various claims against Dasho and WEPCo under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10261 - 2017-09-20
), as a defendant and asserting various claims against Dasho and WEPCo under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10261 - 2017-09-20
Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald Rumage against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11421 - 2017-09-19
foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald Rumage against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11421 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2019. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that he subsequently filed petitions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
, 2019. Electronic circuit court docket entries indicate that he subsequently filed petitions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362354 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
Wilbert Herrling v. Cyril Tilsen
between the parties in 1983. Because we find that a valid novation occurred, we affirm the order.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8676 - 2017-09-19
between the parties in 1983. Because we find that a valid novation occurred, we affirm the order.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8676 - 2017-09-19
Wilbert Herrling v. Cyril Tilsen
on a promissory note executed between the parties in 1983. Because we find that a valid novation occurred, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8676 - 2005-03-31
on a promissory note executed between the parties in 1983. Because we find that a valid novation occurred, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8676 - 2005-03-31