Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15801 - 15810 of 20317 for sai.
Search results 15801 - 15810 of 20317 for sai.
[PDF]
State v. Mai X.
basis in the record to support the trial court's conclusion, and we cannot say the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10842 - 2017-09-20
basis in the record to support the trial court's conclusion, and we cannot say the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10842 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Davon R. Malcom
and facts adduced at the preliminary hearing [that] a defendant cannot be heard to say that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3646 - 2017-09-19
and facts adduced at the preliminary hearing [that] a defendant cannot be heard to say that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3646 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
: the burglary was not “aggravated”; he claims to have cooperated with the police; he says he showed remorse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32620 - 2014-09-15
: the burglary was not “aggravated”; he claims to have cooperated with the police; he says he showed remorse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 152
elicited from Dr. Egge again that he could not say with absolute certainty that Shirley would have saved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
elicited from Dr. Egge again that he could not say with absolute certainty that Shirley would have saved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29238 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
never in my 40 years found anyone coming up to me when they’ve had a good year and saying, “Gee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
never in my 40 years found anyone coming up to me when they’ve had a good year and saying, “Gee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
CA Blank Order
by statute is presumptively not unduly harsh. See Grindemann, 255 Wis. 2d 632, ¶32. We cannot say
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
by statute is presumptively not unduly harsh. See Grindemann, 255 Wis. 2d 632, ¶32. We cannot say
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102185 - 2013-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Saying that the reasonable officer’s interpretation has such relevance would be like rewriting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
.” Saying that the reasonable officer’s interpretation has such relevance would be like rewriting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
State v. Lee Terrence Presley
.2d at 454–462. We did not hold, and I do not read the Majority opinion to say that we did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24830 - 2006-05-30
.2d at 454–462. We did not hold, and I do not read the Majority opinion to say that we did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24830 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at daycare. When she asked C.C. what happened, he said that Herrera “will be mad if I say, if I tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654482 - 2023-05-09
at daycare. When she asked C.C. what happened, he said that Herrera “will be mad if I say, if I tell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654482 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
the provision ambiguous or unambiguous, saying: “And first of all, I find it—I find—I don’t know if I want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27366 - 2014-09-15
the provision ambiguous or unambiguous, saying: “And first of all, I find it—I find—I don’t know if I want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27366 - 2014-09-15