Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15811 - 15820 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] State v. Gregory Pfaff
the trial court did so, any further prosecution of him would violate his constitutional right against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21

State v. Anthony D. Taylor
the plea bargain, but did not pressure him to do so. In his testimony Taylor offered a different version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14171 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony D. Taylor
the plea bargain, but did not pressure him to do so. In his testimony Taylor offered a different version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14172 - 2005-03-31

Columbia County v. Tyler C. Schleicher
therefore be suppressed. He also asserts that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him, thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3464 - 2008-01-03

[PDF] State v. Charles B. Bushong
to the requesting state. ¶9 The lodging of the detainer here did nothing more than put the Colorado authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5654 - 2017-09-19

Juanita Newman v. The City of Delafield
determined that she did not suffer any damages as a result of Dela-Hart’s trespass on her property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15750 - 2005-08-21

CA Blank Order
). The defendant must make a prima facie case that the circuit court did not comply with the procedural
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110987 - 2014-04-29

COURT OF APPEALS
in severe and permanent neurological injury to Emily. The jury found that he did not, and the Olsons moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68316 - 2011-07-20

State v. Corbin Jones
is not warranted because failure to disclose the report did not affect the result of the trial. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8438 - 2005-03-31

State v. Harvey L. Smith
the amended complaint and adding three counts to the information. Because Smith’s counsel did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9574 - 2005-03-31