Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 18126 for 2011.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 18126 for 2011.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions were justified in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment. See State v. Domke, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144662 - 2017-09-21
decisions were justified in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment. See State v. Domke, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2011 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60365 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 24, 2011 A. John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60365 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 15, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75219 - 2011-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 15, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75219 - 2011-12-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Frausto really requests is a sentence modification based on a new factor.” See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084441 - 2026-03-03
Frausto really requests is a sentence modification based on a new factor.” See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084441 - 2026-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59940 - 2011-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59940 - 2011-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a prerequisite for appeal even if they were previously raised at trial.” (citing J.K. v. Peters, 2011 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750265 - 2024-01-11
as a prerequisite for appeal even if they were previously raised at trial.” (citing J.K. v. Peters, 2011 WI App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750265 - 2024-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60974 - 2011-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60974 - 2011-03-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2011 A. John Voelker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60799 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2011 A. John Voelker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60799 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10
to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version, the version in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02
. 1 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version, the version in effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122956 - 2014-10-02