Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 30072 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Jay D. Graff
, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19211 - 2017-09-21
, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19211 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paul McGee v. Carlos R. Bates
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7411 - 2017-09-20
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7411 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fact shall be upheld unless clearly erroneous, while any constitutional question is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181784 - 2017-09-21
fact shall be upheld unless clearly erroneous, while any constitutional question is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391962 - 2021-07-21
Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution under a particular set of facts is an issue of law we review de novo. State v. Haase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
to order restitution under a particular set of facts is an issue of law we review de novo. State v. Haase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
Housing Partnership Corporation v. Ms. Renee Miller
intervention under the statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12190 - 2005-03-31
intervention under the statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 549, 334 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12190 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31