Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15831 - 15840 of 64743 for b's.

State v. Michael Aloysius Huston
properly denied Huston’s suppression motion. B. Witness Testimony ¶9 Huston argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6496 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Antoine B. Lee, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
,” contrary to WIS. STAT. § 343.05(3)(a) and (5)(b)4. Each of the charged counts is a Class I Felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379694 - 2021-06-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), second offense. Burch argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68299 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
64, 799 N.W.2d 850. DISCUSSION ¶12 Wisconsin’s rape shield law, WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2)(b) (2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100541 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the complaining witness’s prior sexual conduct.” See WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2)(b). We also reject Perez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815599 - 2024-06-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 340.01(46m)(a); WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b). Law enforcement also learned that Kettner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743397 - 2023-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. ANTOINE B. LEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21

State v. James R. Coleman
did it for purposes of sexual gratification. See § 940.225(5)(b), 1993-94.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ralph Ovadal
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6152 - 2005-03-31