Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15841 - 15850 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15841 - 15850 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Keizer
a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this No. 2017AP1259-CR 5 court decides de novo. See id., ¶33. Whether a new factor warrants sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
that this No. 2017AP1259-CR 5 court decides de novo. See id., ¶33. Whether a new factor warrants sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
[PDF]
State v. John D. Meindl
, which we review de novo. County of Dane v. Winsand, 2004 WI App 86, ¶5, 271 Wis. 2d 786, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. County of Dane v. Winsand, 2004 WI App 86, ¶5, 271 Wis. 2d 786, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are questions of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. If McClellan fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law we determine de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. If McClellan fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert Perry v. Foremost Farms USA Cooperative
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31