Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15851 - 15860 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient facts, a hearing is required. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195090 - 2017-09-21

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6216 - 2005-03-31

N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31

Ruth M. Bendimez v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire
the appellants appeal. We review a trial court’s decision denying summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13710 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review de novo. See id., ¶44. ¶7 Although we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35614 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21

Delores Hoffman v. Memorial Hospital of Iowa County
interpretation of statutes, a matter which is a question of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8121 - 2005-03-31

State v. James J. Mischler
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12701 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16

James R. Grassman v. Deanna L. Grassman
. However, whether the change is substantial is a legal issue which we review de novo. See id. at 574
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16143 - 2005-03-31