Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15851 - 15860 of 18122 for last will and testament.
Search results 15851 - 15860 of 18122 for last will and testament.
WI App 10 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2011AP407-CR 2011AP408-CR 201...
. The last question posed by the State on cross-examination was: “[D]id you call Julie from L and M Meats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75513 - 2013-04-24
. The last question posed by the State on cross-examination was: “[D]id you call Julie from L and M Meats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75513 - 2013-04-24
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Posthuma
or hide in her room. She testified that the situation had gotten "a lot worse" over the last four years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
or hide in her room. She testified that the situation had gotten "a lot worse" over the last four years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8016 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 92
, knowledgeable persons assumed it did apply to enhanced misdemeanor prison terms. That last phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153578 - 2017-09-21
, knowledgeable persons assumed it did apply to enhanced misdemeanor prison terms. That last phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153578 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the property taken.” The “[f]air market value is the sum a willing purchaser would pay to a willing seller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54399 - 2010-10-26
of the property taken.” The “[f]air market value is the sum a willing purchaser would pay to a willing seller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54399 - 2010-10-26
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
) takes effect on January 1, 1992, not August 2, 1991. Because the last tax year in issue in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17246 - 2005-03-31
) takes effect on January 1, 1992, not August 2, 1991. Because the last tax year in issue in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17246 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
rights on or about July 16, 2010; is that correct? A: 20 what? Q: Ten, last year? A: Right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87829 - 2012-10-09
rights on or about July 16, 2010; is that correct? A: 20 what? Q: Ten, last year? A: Right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87829 - 2012-10-09
State v. Antonio V. Blanco
in duration, lasting “no longer than is necessary to dispel the reasonable suspicion of danger.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14735 - 2005-03-31
in duration, lasting “no longer than is necessary to dispel the reasonable suspicion of danger.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
capacity was what it was historically as opposed to what it was in the last few years, then perhaps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804282 - 2024-05-22
capacity was what it was historically as opposed to what it was in the last few years, then perhaps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804282 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
met. She was very strong willed, she’s very outgoing, and ... [a]fter this has happened, she hates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
met. She was very strong willed, she’s very outgoing, and ... [a]fter this has happened, she hates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121319 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kevin S. Meehan
of the alleged assault at approximately 3:40 p.m., which lasted for twenty minutes. During the cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13461 - 2005-03-31
of the alleged assault at approximately 3:40 p.m., which lasted for twenty minutes. During the cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13461 - 2005-03-31