Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15851 - 15860 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 15851 - 15860 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Marshall reiterates his ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to admit into evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237747 - 2019-03-19
, Marshall reiterates his ineffective assistance claim based on counsel’s failure to admit into evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237747 - 2019-03-19
Wayne K. Hagen v. BMM Molding
disagree. The reason it was frivolous to continue this suit is that Wayne Hagen’s only viable claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12813 - 2005-03-31
disagree. The reason it was frivolous to continue this suit is that Wayne Hagen’s only viable claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12813 - 2005-03-31
State v. William F. Jorgensen
for a Machner[2] hearing based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Jorgensen argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6647 - 2005-03-31
for a Machner[2] hearing based on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Jorgensen argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
stated he had not raised this ineffective-assistance argument previously because his claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48694 - 2014-09-15
stated he had not raised this ineffective-assistance argument previously because his claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48694 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jade Lamont Cosby
an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Cosby claims that: (1) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4319 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Cosby claims that: (1) his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of which underlies this appeal, claimed that his trial and postconviction lawyers were ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28002 - 2014-09-15
of which underlies this appeal, claimed that his trial and postconviction lawyers were ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28002 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of record and in reliance on the applicable law. Id., ¶30. Read’s presentence motion claimed he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95627 - 2014-09-15
of record and in reliance on the applicable law. Id., ¶30. Read’s presentence motion claimed he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of subsequent claims of error. The plea withdrawal issue Shackelford raises however, allows us to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
of subsequent claims of error. The plea withdrawal issue Shackelford raises however, allows us to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
State v. David C. Taylor
ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the statement. In addition, we determine Taylor’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4885 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on the statement. In addition, we determine Taylor’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and claimed that he did not call T.M. a vulgar term, did not activate the chainsaw’s chain, and did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355739 - 2021-04-13
and claimed that he did not call T.M. a vulgar term, did not activate the chainsaw’s chain, and did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355739 - 2021-04-13