Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Angela Van Ess v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System
the Board, thereby abrogating the Board's common law sovereign immunity, by enacting the notice of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8120 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
withdrawal claim, notwithstanding the fact that his conviction has already been affirmed by this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
judgment. In the course of analyzing the latter motion, the court discerned ten possible claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29513 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, rejecting multiple of his claims on their merits and concluding he had forfeited his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, rejecting multiple of his claims on their merits and concluding he had forfeited his ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01

The Scharine Group, Inc. v. Hack Farms, Inc.
The Scharine Group, Inc. The issues are whether the circuit court properly allowed Scharine’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4729 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Childeric Maxy
such a claim and the issue(s) counsel allegedly failed to raise are ones not preserved for review without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17841 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
is whether the court erred by rejecting Reemer’s attempt to defend against their adverse possession claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). Keith’s current claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144241 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] State v. Alphonso Miller
in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us to reject Miller’s claim. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21