Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 98406 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that are not transmitted to a reviewing court via the cold record. Our inability to review demeanor and thus assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355336 - 2021-04-14
that are not transmitted to a reviewing court via the cold record. Our inability to review demeanor and thus assess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355336 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a subsequent motion, Penske submitted billing records to the circuit court documenting its defense costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218051 - 2018-08-21
of a subsequent motion, Penske submitted billing records to the circuit court documenting its defense costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218051 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and that the court lacked contemporaneous records of the investigation because they had been destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
” and that the court lacked contemporaneous records of the investigation because they had been destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Melton
of discretion might be found “if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
of discretion might be found “if the trial court failed to state on the record the material factors which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles E. Melton
the sentence for that reason. The reviewing court is “obliged to search the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
the sentence for that reason. The reviewing court is “obliged to search the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12
State v. Todd J.J.
the can collector.[4] The record fully supports the juvenile court's conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10782 - 2005-03-31
the can collector.[4] The record fully supports the juvenile court's conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd J.J.
if the Court was privy to more facts concerning the shooting than the record establishes." Counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10782 - 2017-09-20
if the Court was privy to more facts concerning the shooting than the record establishes." Counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10782 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183696 - 2017-09-21
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183696 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2009 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36687 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2009 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36687 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the record indicates Bartel never raised this “central question” with the circuit court as part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18
, the record indicates Bartel never raised this “central question” with the circuit court as part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18