Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Troy D. Forler
offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15335 - 2017-09-21
offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Waupun v. Troy G. Hermans
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13379 - 2017-09-21
of a statute to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
is a question of law which we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
interpretation de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96 (1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16147 - 2017-09-21
interpretation de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96 (1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
State v. Arturo Melendez
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08