Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 15861 - 15870 of 83395 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
2002 WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1098 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3879 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1098 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3879 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
apply that intent to the case at hand and do not search for meaning outside the text of the statute. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
apply that intent to the case at hand and do not search for meaning outside the text of the statute. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109569 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, Sherman and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109569 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court to question whether there was a factual basis for one of the charges, and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51174 - 2014-09-15
the trial court to question whether there was a factual basis for one of the charges, and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51174 - 2014-09-15
Kim Nowatske v. Mark D. Osterloh, M.D.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7696 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7696 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to question whether there was a factual basis for one of the charges, and the case proceeded to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
to question whether there was a factual basis for one of the charges, and the case proceeded to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
2009 WI APP 145
2009 WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1528 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
2009 WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP1528 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27