Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15871 - 15880 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15871 - 15880 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
State v. Arturo Melendez
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
.2d 733, 737 (1968). We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
.2d 733, 737 (1968). We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van DE Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2008-03-26
review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id. The reasonableness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32259 - 2008-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
damages, that issue presents a legal question, which is reviewed de novo. J.K., 337 Wis. 2d 504, ¶32. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111941 - 2014-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15