Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15871 - 15880 of 17547 for ex.

State v. Corey J. Hampton
contends that under State ex rel. White v. Gray, 57 Wis. 2d 17, 203 N.W.2d 638 (1973), and the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3648 - 2005-03-31

Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
this court has repeatedly held that our review of a case is limited to the record. State ex rel. Wolf v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17242 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Curtis E. Gallion
sentencing rationale, Gallion relies on two federal cases, United States ex rel. Scott v. Illinois Parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3471 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 212
of the statute to determine and give effect to legislative intent. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26600 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from his ex-spouse—before the trial period could begin. ¶4 On October 9, 2009, while the loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98294 - 2014-09-15

Lori Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.
discussion among physicians to improve the overall quality of services they provide. State ex rel. Good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3014 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶45-46, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38604 - 2014-09-15

Repap Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
language of a statute. See State ex rel. Girouard v. Jackson Circuit Court, 155 Wis.2d 148, 155-56, 454
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9020 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas H. Bush
. App. 1997), and State ex rel. Skinkis v. Treffert, 90 Wis. 2d 528, 280 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. (1979
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18883 - 2005-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of which is a proper approach to statutory interpretation. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187300 - 2017-09-21