Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15871 - 15880 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 15871 - 15880 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 Rivera argues that the trial court’s admission of other acts evidence was prejudicial error.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239807 - 2019-04-30
¶2 Rivera argues that the trial court’s admission of other acts evidence was prejudicial error.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239807 - 2019-04-30
2011 WI APP 63
on the basis that the evidence was insufficient for this lesser included. The trial court allowed it and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
on the basis that the evidence was insufficient for this lesser included. The trial court allowed it and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63073 - 2011-05-25
[PDF]
WI APP 63
for this lesser included. The trial court allowed it and he was convicted of the lesser offense. He now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63073 - 2014-09-15
for this lesser included. The trial court allowed it and he was convicted of the lesser offense. He now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dale R. Rapey
; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because the statute clearly defines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12021 - 2017-09-21
; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. Because the statute clearly defines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12021 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 16
to withdraw his plea.1 Atwater contends that the court erred when it determined that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331672 - 2021-04-19
to withdraw his plea.1 Atwater contends that the court erred when it determined that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331672 - 2021-04-19
Digicorp, Inc. v. Ameritech Corporation
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Bacher’s request to submit punitive damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4327 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Bacher’s request to submit punitive damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4327 - 2005-03-31
Digicorp, Inc. v. Ameritech Corporation
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Bacher’s request to submit punitive damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4155 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Bacher’s request to submit punitive damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it is entitled to a new trial based on: (1) an erroneous jury instruction; and (2) the Haldersons’ attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216059 - 2018-07-24
it is entitled to a new trial based on: (1) an erroneous jury instruction; and (2) the Haldersons’ attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216059 - 2018-07-24
Lewis Altman, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, while still in Waupun, he presented the trial court with a petition for writ of certiorari, accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2131 - 2005-03-31
, while still in Waupun, he presented the trial court with a petition for writ of certiorari, accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2131 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Canedy
relief which alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court concluded that Canedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7724 - 2005-03-31
relief which alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court concluded that Canedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7724 - 2005-03-31