Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15881 - 15890 of 86847 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Tukang Buat Interior Rumah Minimalis 2 Lantai Type 70 WIlayah Sragen.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. STAT. No. 2016AP1350-CRNM 2 RULE 809.32 (2015-16). 1 Stewart was advised of his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219871 - 2018-09-24

State v. Randy D. Stafford
modification of Stafford’s sentence. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4991 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the supplemental report, and our independent No. 2014AP184-CRNM 2 review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120646 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
second-degree sexual assault of a child. See Wis. Stat. §§ 948.05, 948.02(2), 939.32 (2003-04).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30266 - 2007-09-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the crimes, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.32(2) and § 939.05. McCaa’s appellate lawyer, Marcella DePeters
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in these consolidated cases pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 Nos. 2023AP180-CRNM 2023AP181-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12

State v. Eduardo Jose Trigueros
. Trigueros alleges that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17661 - 2005-07-06

WI App 20 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP137 Complete Title of ...
property. Savage requested that a jury determine the amount of compensation he was due for the taking. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91634 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] NOTICE
2 offender registry in violation of WIS. STAT. § 301.45(6)(a)1. (2007-08),1 and from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42986 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Elvers
must No. 2003AP2637-CR 2 personally advise a defendant that the court is not obligated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21