Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Richard G. Giese
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
Paul McGee v. Carlos R. Bates
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7411 - 2005-03-31
Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. G.
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19
demonstrating the blood test results. Randy appeals. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John E. Taylor
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Miguel Rocha-Castro
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
-representation has been violated is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Darby, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 656, 766 N.W.2d 559. Mootness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815536 - 2024-06-19
Wis. 2d 656, 766 N.W.2d 559. Mootness is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815536 - 2024-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03