Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 30177 for de.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 30177 for de.
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
State v. Spring A. Long
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31
Corinne L. v. Douglas P.
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
of discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. We must sustain the March 14, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the facts as found meet the probable cause standard is a question of law the court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72836 - 2014-09-15
. Whether the facts as found meet the probable cause standard is a question of law the court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72836 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donna J. Prill
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
of this appeal requires us to interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief’” is a legal question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief’” is a legal question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31063 - 2007-12-04
performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31063 - 2007-12-04
Frontsheet
conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52671 - 2010-07-27
conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52671 - 2010-07-27
Daniel R. Taylor v. Susan M. Taylor
de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4827 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4827 - 2005-03-31