Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 29740 for des.
Search results 15891 - 15900 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
,” as required by Wis. Stat. § 973.20(4m), is a question of statutory construction that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55511 - 2010-10-13
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999). This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Monte L. Jackson
, subject to de novo review. See State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13187 - 2017-09-21
, subject to de novo review. See State v. Franklin, 148 Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13187 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
State v. Willie J. Hickles
that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. Once we independently confirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. Once we independently confirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
Paul McGee v. Carlos R. Bates
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7411 - 2017-09-20
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7411 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10
a conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256126 - 2020-03-10