Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1591 - 1600 of 17421 for Cost.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
Attorney Sostarich to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding. ¶3 Attorney Sostarich was admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Sharon A. Davison
of this decision, the cost of these proceedings totaling $8,717.21. ¶3 Sharon A. Davison was admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16391 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
copies of his transcripts, and obtaining new copies will apparently cost over $950. He seeks copies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232740 - 2019-01-11

COURT OF APPEALS
on the mortgage debt and costs of sale, there shall be no presumption that such premises sold for their fair value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56192 - 2010-11-01

County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
for costs and fees. BACKGROUND Robert Ruffer bought property on the shore of Petenwell Lake in Adams County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the amount due and to become due on the mortgage debt and costs of sale, there shall be no presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56192 - 2014-09-15

Pounder Brothers, Inc. v. Guardian Pipeline, LLC
and reverse in part the trial court’s decision on attorneys’ fees and costs to the condemnee and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7252 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pounder Brothers, Inc. v. Guardian Pipeline, LLC
and reverse in part the trial court’s decision on attorneys’ fees and costs to the condemnee and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7252 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
costs. MODS argues the circuit court erred by determining that MODS was not entitled to an equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258274 - 2020-04-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $2,188.05 as of February 6, 2018. ¶3 Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210740 - 2018-05-10