Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1591 - 1600 of 4851 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Pusat Pintu Double Minimalis Matesih Karanganyar.
Search results 1591 - 1600 of 4851 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Pusat Pintu Double Minimalis Matesih Karanganyar.
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 7 (effective October 1, 2018)
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-10-02
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
2017 OWI Guidelines District 7
(On & After 06-01-2017) 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017.pdf - 2017-07-21
(On & After 06-01-2017) 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2017.pdf - 2017-07-21
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 7
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
(§346.65(7))] REVOCATION: 12 – 18 Months (doubles under (§343.30(1q)(b)4m)), plus number of days of jail
/publications/fees/docs/d7owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a final judgment against him of $19,445 in compensatory damages, double No. 2025AP1734 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1145648 - 2026-07-15
a final judgment against him of $19,445 in compensatory damages, double No. 2025AP1734 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1145648 - 2026-07-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. C.
Charles a fair trial; (4) his fifteen-year sentence is excessive and constitutes double jeopardy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
Charles a fair trial; (4) his fifteen-year sentence is excessive and constitutes double jeopardy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
Vicky L. Stellflue v. Lloyd C. Stellflue
to have double-counted some assets, we affirm the judgment in part, reverse it in part, and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10707 - 2005-03-31
to have double-counted some assets, we affirm the judgment in part, reverse it in part, and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10707 - 2005-03-31
Julie L. Weber v. Angelene White
judgment in the amount of $36,278.50 and awarded the Webers double costs and interest pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6182 - 2005-03-31
judgment in the amount of $36,278.50 and awarded the Webers double costs and interest pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6182 - 2005-03-31
Shirley A. Smedema v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company
settlement for $165,000, she is entitled to pre-judgment interest and double costs under Rule 807.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10562 - 2005-03-31
settlement for $165,000, she is entitled to pre-judgment interest and double costs under Rule 807.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
addressed Wis. Stat. § 961.45 (2007-08),[1] providing for double jeopardy protection against successive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36810 - 2009-07-28
addressed Wis. Stat. § 961.45 (2007-08),[1] providing for double jeopardy protection against successive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36810 - 2009-07-28
Mark Lattimore v. Caldon Rushing
to pay him double damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys fees for violating an administrative rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24572 - 2006-03-22
to pay him double damages, costs, and reasonable attorneys fees for violating an administrative rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24572 - 2006-03-22