Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1591 - 1600 of 69052 for he.
Search results 1591 - 1600 of 69052 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 22, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
At trial, Patterson testified in his own defense, telling the jury that he acted in self-defense.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117631 - 2014-07-21
At trial, Patterson testified in his own defense, telling the jury that he acted in self-defense.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117631 - 2014-07-21
State v. Jason T. Hutchins
consent. See § 943.23(3), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13536 - 2005-03-31
consent. See § 943.23(3), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
following a guilty plea. Massie argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he was ineligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
following a guilty plea. Massie argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he was ineligible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
State v. Carl Andre Brown
for party to the crime of felony murder. He claims that his statements to police should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
for party to the crime of felony murder. He claims that his statements to police should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
following a guilty plea. Massie argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he was ineligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
following a guilty plea. Massie argues that the circuit court erred in finding that he was ineligible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29
State v. John Edward Kraemer
sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2).[1] He argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2).[1] He argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied Cooper’s motion to be relieved of sex offender registry requirements. Cooper contends that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
that denied Cooper’s motion to be relieved of sex offender registry requirements. Cooper contends that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to repeated sexual assault of the same child as a persistent repeater. He also appeals from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
to repeated sexual assault of the same child as a persistent repeater. He also appeals from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the court erred by denying his suppression motion because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80137 - 2014-09-15
argues the court erred by denying his suppression motion because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80137 - 2014-09-15