Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 59310 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Daniel T. Shea
card. We affirmed the convictions, rejecting Shea’s claim that he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2759 - 2005-03-31

Sauk County Department of Human Services v. James Carney
to these claims. That ruling eliminated Carney’s statute of limitations defense for reimbursement of the 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11952 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alphonso Miller
in Carprue is determinative of this case, and leads us to reject Miller’s claim. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17945 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was inappropriate because it pled sufficient facts to state a claim challenging the validity of the appraisal based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100215 - 2013-07-31

COURT OF APPEALS
possible claims that Seibert’s complaint contained. It ruled that some of them did not state a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29513 - 2007-06-27

[PDF] Patricia Marshall Scales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
awarding Patricia Scales damages and costs arising from a slip-and-fall case. Wal-Mart claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16125 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Angela Van Ess v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System
the Board, thereby abrogating the Board's common law sovereign immunity, by enacting the notice of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8120 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Margaret, but not before the statute of limitations on the corporation’s contract claims expired
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179843 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as inadequately developed. The circuit court dismissed the claims against the Minnesota defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the claims against the Minnesota defendants on the grounds that Stanton did not have a constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04