Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 44408 for name change.

Theresa L. C. v. Jeremy C. P.
court erroneously exercised its discretion by not ordering a new trial or changing the verdict answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7084 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Keith D. Heacox
misled the jury and violated his due process rights; and (4) changes to ch. 980 violate equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3988 - 2017-09-20

Charles A. Poindexter II v. Pamela J. Kagan
that Poindexter’s proven record of sexual abuse constituted a “huge change of circumstances,” noting that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15079 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
of the wetland, because of the text amendment change.” One board member stated, I’m going to make a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5380 - 2005-03-31

Antigo Homes, Inc. v. John K. Raimer
. The court therefore changed the amount on the judgment to reflect the statutory amount of $100. Antigo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7229 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wendell Klein v. Town of Trempealeau
. The Kleins sought an injunction to make the Town change a culvert contributing to flooding on their farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14440 - 2017-09-21

Wendell Klein v. Town of Trempealeau
the Town change a culvert contributing to flooding on their farm land. The Town had enlarged the culvert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14440 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith D. Heacox
rights; and (4) changes to ch. 980 violate equal protection. We conclude that a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3988 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Milligan
is consequential to an issue in the case and would have changed the result of the proceeding. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2346 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ignacio P. Gonzalez
not been overturned or changed by a subsequent change in the law. In refusing to dismiss the refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16294 - 2017-09-21