Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5508 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a pair of orders dismissing his claims for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4948 - 2017-09-19

Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion after having filed a previous postconviction motion or direct appeal, the claim is barred unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10).1 We reject Ringold’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93581 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Prairie) and dismissed his case because he did not properly serve his claim alleging “Excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. Long $6,764.04 plus attorney’s fees following a bench trial for a property damage claim. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1144098 - 2026-07-15

COURT OF APPEALS
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. Boose claims the circuit court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
postconviction motion. He raises one claim of error: that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18775 - 2017-09-21