Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 83455 for simple case search.
Teddy A. Schlueter v. Kae Hubred
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State called Zach Holler, the family case manager for N.M.’s case at SaintA (the Agency). Holler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289478 - 2020-09-22
, the State called Zach Holler, the family case manager for N.M.’s case at SaintA (the Agency). Holler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289478 - 2020-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
if it is not “reasonable” under Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Id. at 810. To determine whether a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56842 - 2010-11-17
if it is not “reasonable” under Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Id. at 810. To determine whether a search or seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56842 - 2010-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
[PDF]
Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
2002 WI App 26 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1098
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3879 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 26 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1098
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3879 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12