Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 15901 - 15910 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dose of fentanyl in his system when he died, and officers who searched the residence where he died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013950 - 2025-09-24
dose of fentanyl in his system when he died, and officers who searched the residence where he died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013950 - 2025-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the “waste” statute.2 Rather, the court expressly noted that the so-called “add-back” line of cases comes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79891 - 2014-09-15
of the “waste” statute.2 Rather, the court expressly noted that the so-called “add-back” line of cases comes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2390 - 2017-09-19
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2390 - 2017-09-19
Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
Teddy A. Schlueter v. Kae Hubred
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
the case. When questioned by the trial court, trial counsel confirmed that he had a conversation about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
Like the Spaeth case, this case involves the penalty provisions of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(2) because OAS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court remanded the case for further deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
[PDF]
WI APP 59
2013 WI APP 59 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP827-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94722 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI APP 59 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP827-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94722 - 2014-09-15