Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15911 - 15920 of 30178 for de.
Search results 15911 - 15920 of 30178 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
27, 2017, not November 24, 2017. No. 2023AP920-CR 6 review de novo.” State v. Popke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
27, 2017, not November 24, 2017. No. 2023AP920-CR 6 review de novo.” State v. Popke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W.2d 920 (2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997177 - 2025-08-20
2009 WI APP 146
are questions of law that we review de novo. Andrews, 316 Wis. 2d 734, ¶10. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40489 - 2009-10-27
are questions of law that we review de novo. Andrews, 316 Wis. 2d 734, ¶10. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40489 - 2009-10-27
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. We interpret statutes de novo. Scholten Pattern Works, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 152 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30818 - 2007-11-07
. We interpret statutes de novo. Scholten Pattern Works, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 152 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30818 - 2007-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assessment. Accordingly, we review Mahnke’s testimony to determine de novo whether the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21
assessment. Accordingly, we review Mahnke’s testimony to determine de novo whether the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
which we review de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. County of Dodge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26656 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo without deference to the circuit court’s decision. County of Dodge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26656 - 2014-09-15
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
Mortgage Lenders Network v. Sandra J. Wangert-Fitzgerald
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7273 - 2005-03-31
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7273 - 2005-03-31