Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15911 - 15920 of 40050 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15911 - 15920 of 40050 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Harry S. Bernstein
statement waiving his statutory right to a jury trial. Bernstein also makes the additional arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
statement waiving his statutory right to a jury trial. Bernstein also makes the additional arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
mitigation evidence and to object to an unduly prejudicial victim impact statement. None of his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34510 - 2014-09-15
mitigation evidence and to object to an unduly prejudicial victim impact statement. None of his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pretrial motion to suppress statements she made to police. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183668 - 2017-09-21
pretrial motion to suppress statements she made to police. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
own defense, he reverted to his initial statement and said he was coerced to falsely admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175582 - 2017-09-21
own defense, he reverted to his initial statement and said he was coerced to falsely admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
behalf. Because we conclude the physician's No. 94-0930-CR -2- statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
behalf. Because we conclude the physician's No. 94-0930-CR -2- statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
impact statement. None of his arguments are persuasive. We affirm the judgment and the order. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
impact statement. None of his arguments are persuasive. We affirm the judgment and the order. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34510 - 2008-11-11
State v. Duane E. Elm
. Because we conclude the physician's statement was admissible opinion testimony and Elm was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
. Because we conclude the physician's statement was admissible opinion testimony and Elm was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of No. 2015AP1154-CR 2 his custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of No. 2015AP1154-CR 2 his custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174071 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress the custodial statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85498 - 2012-07-31
motion to suppress the custodial statements made to law enforcement officers after her arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85498 - 2012-07-31
State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31