Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Susan M. Tennyson v. School District of the Menomonie Area
challenged the trial court’s decision to allow the district to claim an offset for unemployment compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
challenged the trial court’s decision to allow the district to claim an offset for unemployment compensation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert L. Guck v. Gary McCaughtry
. Guck sued McCaughtry and Hilt,1 claiming that his injuries were caused by (1) McCaughtry's violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10028 - 2017-09-19
. Guck sued McCaughtry and Hilt,1 claiming that his injuries were caused by (1) McCaughtry's violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10028 - 2017-09-19
Isaacs Holding Corp. v. Premiere Property Group, LLC
, is barred by the principle of res judicata (hereinafter, claim preclusion) from challenging the prior ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6633 - 2005-03-31
, is barred by the principle of res judicata (hereinafter, claim preclusion) from challenging the prior ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and for reconsideration. He claims No. 2015AP1357-CR 2 his trial counsel was ineffective in multiple ways
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180727 - 2017-09-21
and for reconsideration. He claims No. 2015AP1357-CR 2 his trial counsel was ineffective in multiple ways
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180727 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Isaacs Holding Corp. v. Premiere Property Group, LLC
by the principle of res judicata (hereinafter, claim preclusion) from challenging the prior ruling ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6775 - 2017-09-20
by the principle of res judicata (hereinafter, claim preclusion) from challenging the prior ruling ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6775 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that Prude’s claims are procedurally barred. We affirm. Background ¶2 Prude pled guilty to five counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
that Prude’s claims are procedurally barred. We affirm. Background ¶2 Prude pled guilty to five counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
consecutive sentences for crimes involving the same victim. The circuit court rejected his claims. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
consecutive sentences for crimes involving the same victim. The circuit court rejected his claims. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116991 - 2014-07-17
Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
) and MariLynn Peterson, pro se, appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss one of their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
) and MariLynn Peterson, pro se, appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss one of their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Krueger’s postconviction claims either were or could have been litigated in prior postconviction motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206941 - 2018-01-17
Krueger’s postconviction claims either were or could have been litigated in prior postconviction motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206941 - 2018-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims in response to the no-merit report. Additionally, the court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087514 - 2026-03-10
claims in response to the no-merit report. Additionally, the court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087514 - 2026-03-10