Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
State v. William E. Conley
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
a claim for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State ex rel. Treat v. Puckett
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461376 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
Dodge County v. Ryan E. M.
in the context of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Hinrichs v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
in the context of WIS. STAT. § 51.20(7)(a). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Hinrichs v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3914 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 127
erroneous. Id., ¶12. Then, we review de novo whether those facts constitute a Fourth Amendment violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69202 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Id., ¶12. Then, we review de novo whether those facts constitute a Fourth Amendment violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
29, ¶11, 240 Wis. 2d 481, 623 N.W.2d 137 (WI App 2000). However, I review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
29, ¶11, 240 Wis. 2d 481, 623 N.W.2d 137 (WI App 2000). However, I review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Avery
No. 99-2488-CR 6 prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
No. 99-2488-CR 6 prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
satisfy the statutory standard for recommitment is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269568 - 2020-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the facts, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245322 - 2019-08-20
to the facts, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245322 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for three crimes. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31
to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for three crimes. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31