Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a stop passes constitutional muster is a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49203 - 2010-04-27
Whether a stop passes constitutional muster is a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49203 - 2010-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). Statutory interpretation is an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Ozuna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
omitted). Statutory interpretation is an issue of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Ozuna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to conceded facts is a question of law we review de novo. Crawford ex rel. Goodyear v. Care Concepts, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180495 - 2017-09-21
to conceded facts is a question of law we review de novo. Crawford ex rel. Goodyear v. Care Concepts, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180495 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court will “uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21
, this court will “uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ¶6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ¶6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez
reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify in defense of the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. See id. ¶7 Hernandez contends that his right to testify in defense of the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21