Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 15921 - 15930 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020054 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772869 - 2024-03-05
independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772869 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285938 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252142 - 2020-01-07
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252142 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Gonzalez sent several letters in response. After an independent review of the records and counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979132 - 2025-07-09
, and Gonzalez sent several letters in response. After an independent review of the records and counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979132 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257491 - 2020-04-15
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257491 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charges. Under Williams, Sellers—who, according to CCAP records previously provided a DNA sample 2 —has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203146 - 2017-11-16
charges. Under Williams, Sellers—who, according to CCAP records previously provided a DNA sample 2 —has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203146 - 2017-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Flisram
. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12343 - 2017-09-21
. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes these issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12343 - 2017-09-21