Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 86274 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Rumah Subsidi Jadi Satu Tugu Kota Semarang Jawa Tengah.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 86274 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Rumah Subsidi Jadi Satu Tugu Kota Semarang Jawa Tengah.
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January 21, 2009, Luckett pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49006 - 2010-04-20
a hearing. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January 21, 2009, Luckett pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49006 - 2010-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Natasha M. Ruetten
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4348 - 2017-09-19
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4348 - 2017-09-19
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
) that the court found a legal right-of-way where none existed; (2) that in doing so, it relied on inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
) that the court found a legal right-of-way where none existed; (2) that in doing so, it relied on inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was in fact given. We affirm. ¶2 On August 29, 2011, Hernandez was charged with operating while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
was in fact given. We affirm. ¶2 On August 29, 2011, Hernandez was charged with operating while under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Bruce H. Manke
is decided by a single judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997- 98). No. 99-2016-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15815 - 2017-09-21
is decided by a single judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997- 98). No. 99-2016-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
June Table of Unpublished Opinions
1 Petition for Review Filed 2 Petition for Review Denied 3 Petition for Review Granted 4
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25881 - 2017-09-21
1 Petition for Review Filed 2 Petition for Review Denied 3 Petition for Review Granted 4
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25881 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is entitled to be resentenced because (1) the court did Nos. 2009AP2878-CR 2009AP2879-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to be resentenced because (1) the court did Nos. 2009AP2878-CR 2009AP2879-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and for reconsideration. Because the claims are barred, we affirm. No. 2009AP660-CR 2 BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49838 - 2014-09-15
and for reconsideration. Because the claims are barred, we affirm. No. 2009AP660-CR 2 BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49838 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2025AP1386-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Wilterdink appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1148319 - 2026-07-21
). No. 2025AP1386-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Richard Wilterdink appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1148319 - 2026-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
relief than he requested in his original appeal.[1] We disagree and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28693 - 2007-04-09
relief than he requested in his original appeal.[1] We disagree and affirm the judgment. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28693 - 2007-04-09