Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 30019 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 30019 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 128
or technical is a question of law that we review de novo, and the burden is on the party alleged to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69688 - 2014-09-15
or technical is a question of law that we review de novo, and the burden is on the party alleged to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69688 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
unless clearly erroneous, but we review the legal standards for ineffective assistance de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo whether counterclaims state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See DeBruin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137161 - 2017-09-21
review de novo whether counterclaims state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See DeBruin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dean P. Lenz
standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Krier, 165 Wis.2d at 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15246 - 2017-09-21
standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Krier, 165 Wis.2d at 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15246 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80630 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the trial court’s findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard; we then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
review the trial court’s findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard; we then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
Joe Tynan v. JBVBB, LLC
. We review the granting of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6088 - 2005-03-31
. We review the granting of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6088 - 2005-03-31
Michael Hupy & Associates v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6090 - 2005-03-31
grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6090 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, certiorari review is confined to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29
, certiorari review is confined to the record and the court does not weigh the evidence or conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122817 - 2014-09-29