Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 30077 for de.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 30077 for de.
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
and remand to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
and remand to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecution agreement is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
prosecution agreement is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Naydihor, 270 Wis. 2d 585 at ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01
State v. Brook Grzelak
. This case requires us to interpret § 976.05(3)(a), Stats., which we do de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
. This case requires us to interpret § 976.05(3)(a), Stats., which we do de novo. See Kettner v. Wausau Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
of reasonable suspicion de novo. See id. ¶10 Here, the circuit court found that Jaeger’s initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2011-11-01
State v. Randall M. Miller
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael A. Simmons
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
Bruce Mieloch v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31