Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15931 - 15940 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177635 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ventae Parrow
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
presents an issue of statutory interpretation, a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we consider de novo. See id. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a circuit court’s findings of fact, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92439 - 2014-09-15

Martin A. Bruflat v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company
a summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15832 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law” that we review de novo. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410210 - 2021-08-17

Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
. DISCUSSION We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment.[4] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13074 - 2005-03-31