Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 30076 for de.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 30076 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
it to retain the income as de minimus. These issues were addressed by Rynders in an affidavit submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126143 - 2014-11-10
it to retain the income as de minimus. These issues were addressed by Rynders in an affidavit submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126143 - 2014-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45732 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
. This is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. If “the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102445 - 2013-09-25
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Bach’s lawsuit. Bach appeals that ruling. ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20
and dismissed Bach’s lawsuit. Bach appeals that ruling. ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20
State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31