Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 68502 for did.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Glover
. No. 2005AP1620-CR 3 She testified that she did not observe any other type of traffic violation or erratic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP1620-CR 3 She testified that she did not observe any other type of traffic violation or erratic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
privileges for one year. 2 Valstad argues that his refusal was proper because the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
privileges for one year. 2 Valstad argues that his refusal was proper because the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for the circuit court’s decision to dismiss the case. We conclude that it did. ¶13 The decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34841 - 2008-12-08
for the circuit court’s decision to dismiss the case. We conclude that it did. ¶13 The decision to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34841 - 2008-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
of Barbara Doyle, its expert. Sweeney did not challenge Doyle’s qualification and expertise for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28031 - 2007-02-06
of Barbara Doyle, its expert. Sweeney did not challenge Doyle’s qualification and expertise for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28031 - 2007-02-06
State v. Lindsey A. Fritz
don’t exactly remember the day it was but he had actually called and he was saying that I did things
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7586 - 2005-03-31
don’t exactly remember the day it was but he had actually called and he was saying that I did things
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7586 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas Z. P.
and did not fall within any recognized exception to the hearsay rule. After Bullion provided further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4426 - 2005-03-31
and did not fall within any recognized exception to the hearsay rule. After Bullion provided further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4426 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kirk W. Holstein
to conduct a traffic stop of Holstein’s vehicle. Specifically, he argues that the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4957 - 2005-03-31
to conduct a traffic stop of Holstein’s vehicle. Specifically, he argues that the officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
determined that the case did not fall within WIS. STAT. § 973.13, which allows for a commutation, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30483 - 2014-09-15
determined that the case did not fall within WIS. STAT. § 973.13, which allows for a commutation, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30483 - 2014-09-15
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6201 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6213 - 2005-03-31
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6213 - 2005-03-31