Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 17244 for probate/1000.
State v. Keith R. Randolph
while on probation, in concluding that inevitably prison time would need to be imposed. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2015-08-13
while on probation, in concluding that inevitably prison time would need to be imposed. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2015-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
and being placed on probation. Because the defense delved into the circumstances of the prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
and being placed on probation. Because the defense delved into the circumstances of the prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
Bert L. Warnecke, Sr. v. Bert L. Warnecke II
the Managed Forest Lands Program.” By the time Warnecke petitioned the probate court for the return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
the Managed Forest Lands Program.” By the time Warnecke petitioned the probate court for the return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24663 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, the guardian files with the probate court having jurisdiction of the guardianship and protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2012-08-15
, the guardian files with the probate court having jurisdiction of the guardianship and protective placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86169 - 2012-08-15
State v. James E. Szulczewski
the person on probation to the DOC under § 973.09(1)(a) or (3) for not more than 60 days.[5] Although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17114 - 2005-03-31
the person on probation to the DOC under § 973.09(1)(a) or (3) for not more than 60 days.[5] Although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Oto Orlik
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
three counts, but then stayed the sentences and placed Garro on probation for three years.[2] ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
three counts, but then stayed the sentences and placed Garro on probation for three years.[2] ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105891 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
Cheryl D. v. Robert D.B.
to the admission of Robert’s will to probate.3 The estate moved for summary judgment. Based on Cheryl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10130 - 2017-09-19
to the admission of Robert’s will to probate.3 The estate moved for summary judgment. Based on Cheryl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10130 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the drug offense and ordered Baldwin to serve a consecutive term of probation. ¶4 Baldwin’s appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58303 - 2014-09-15
for the drug offense and ordered Baldwin to serve a consecutive term of probation. ¶4 Baldwin’s appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ extended supervision, and placed Zastrow on three years’ probation, to be served consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237752 - 2019-03-21
years’ extended supervision, and placed Zastrow on three years’ probation, to be served consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237752 - 2019-03-21