Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 18789 for quote.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 18789 for quote.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Sixth Amendment.” State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (quoting Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
by the Sixth Amendment.” State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990) (quoting Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31016 - 2007-12-03
State v. Antonio L. Simmons
and quoted source omitted); see also Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶46. Nevertheless, if a sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31
and quoted source omitted); see also Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶46. Nevertheless, if a sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 38
. at 918 (quoting Kabella v. Bouschelle, 672 P.2d 290, 294 (N.M. Ct. App. 1983)). ¶20 Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31825 - 2014-09-15
. at 918 (quoting Kabella v. Bouschelle, 672 P.2d 290, 294 (N.M. Ct. App. 1983)). ¶20 Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31825 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy Maurice Eib
“no presumption against the justice of the verdict.” Id. at 720, 370 N.W.2d at 764 (quoting Rockwell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12120 - 2017-09-21
“no presumption against the justice of the verdict.” Id. at 720, 370 N.W.2d at 764 (quoting Rockwell v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12120 - 2017-09-21
State v. Latosha Armstead
, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74, 83 (1993) (quoted source omitted). “The first prong of the vagueness test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
, 276, 496 N.W.2d 74, 83 (1993) (quoted source omitted). “The first prong of the vagueness test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the first and the next-to-the-last word.’” Nodell Inv. Corp., 78 Wis. 2d at 427 n.13 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
to the first and the next-to-the-last word.’” Nodell Inv. Corp., 78 Wis. 2d at 427 n.13 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134831 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
the need for “‘ingenuity [and] foresightedness’”) (quoted source omitted), and viewed against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30035 - 2007-08-20
the need for “‘ingenuity [and] foresightedness’”) (quoted source omitted), and viewed against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30035 - 2007-08-20
Anton Chanlynn v. Chancery Restaurant
was not addressed by the reconsideration motion or by the reconsideration proceedings. The above quote comes from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8901 - 2005-03-31
was not addressed by the reconsideration motion or by the reconsideration proceedings. The above quote comes from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8901 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher D. Anson
.” Id. (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 (1942)). In Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4532 - 2005-03-31
.” Id. (quoting Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279 (1942)). In Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“to entertain actions of any nature whatsoever.” Id. (quoting Wis. Const. Art. VII, § 8). An untimely motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30558 - 2007-10-09
“to entertain actions of any nature whatsoever.” Id. (quoting Wis. Const. Art. VII, § 8). An untimely motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30558 - 2007-10-09