Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 73699 for we.
Search results 15951 - 15960 of 73699 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
was originally sentenced—violated his double jeopardy protections. We disagree. Armstrong did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83041 - 2012-05-29
was originally sentenced—violated his double jeopardy protections. We disagree. Armstrong did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83041 - 2012-05-29
[PDF]
Barron County v. Brian T.
exercised its discretion by issuing a child support order with which Brian cannot possibly comply. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4620 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion by issuing a child support order with which Brian cannot possibly comply. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4620 - 2017-09-19
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
and that errors by the trial court culminated in a misuse of sentencing discretion.[1] We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
and that errors by the trial court culminated in a misuse of sentencing discretion.[1] We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his competency to proceed. We reject C.G.B.’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
his competency to proceed. We reject C.G.B.’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871443 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
Village of Plover v. Scott K. Pittman
test for alcohol. We conclude that even if we were to assume that the challenged testimony were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3828 - 2017-09-20
test for alcohol. We conclude that even if we were to assume that the challenged testimony were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3828 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Eau Claire County Department of Human Services v. Sherrinda M.
the issue. We disagree and affirm the order. Background ¶2 Devon had been adjudicated a child in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6650 - 2017-09-20
the issue. We disagree and affirm the order. Background ¶2 Devon had been adjudicated a child in need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6650 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Antwon C.
–94).2 We affirm. A petition alleging the delinquency of Antwon C. was filed on February 9, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12015 - 2017-09-21
–94).2 We affirm. A petition alleging the delinquency of Antwon C. was filed on February 9, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12015 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
has been called upon to allow true revocation in the past, but has declined to do so. We have said
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251621 - 2019-12-18
has been called upon to allow true revocation in the past, but has declined to do so. We have said
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251621 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Silvester B. Donoe
, and his two trial counsel were ineffective for a variety of reasons. Because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26472 - 2017-09-21
, and his two trial counsel were ineffective for a variety of reasons. Because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26472 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12
)1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=811440 - 2024-06-12