Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
State v. David J. Baertschi
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
/her constitutional right to present a defense is subject to our de novo review. In Interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
/her constitutional right to present a defense is subject to our de novo review. In Interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
James M. Povolny v. James B. Totzke
the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo. See Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5883 - 2005-03-31
the statutory requirements is a question of law we consider de novo. See Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5883 - 2005-03-31
Gregory J. Grambow v. Associated Dental Services, Inc.
de novo. First Federated Sav. Bank v. McDonah, 143 Wis.2d 429, 433, 422 N.W.2d 113, 115 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7946 - 2005-03-31
de novo. First Federated Sav. Bank v. McDonah, 143 Wis.2d 429, 433, 422 N.W.2d 113, 115 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶12 This court reviews de novo the legal question of whether a complaint states a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440656 - 2021-10-14
of Review ¶12 This court reviews de novo the legal question of whether a complaint states a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440656 - 2021-10-14
[PDF]
Mid-State Contracting, Inc. v. Superior Floor Company, Inc.
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW Transp. Co., 191 Wis. 2d 626, 638, 530 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5060 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW Transp. Co., 191 Wis. 2d 626, 638, 530 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5060 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo. Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38154 - 2009-07-22
review the trial court’s application of law to undisputed facts de novo. Theuer v. Labor & Indus. Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38154 - 2009-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01