Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 30178 for de.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 30178 for de.
2008 WI APP 183
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). We must determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). We must determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Schaab
cause determination at a preliminary hearing is de novo. See State v. Johnson, 231 Wis. 2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15906 - 2017-09-21
cause determination at a preliminary hearing is de novo. See State v. Johnson, 231 Wis. 2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15906 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
Jennifer L. Lyon v. Michael R. Max
review de novo. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Spencer's Kenosha Bowl, 137 Wis.2d 313, 317, 404 N.W.2d 109, 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9939 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Spencer's Kenosha Bowl, 137 Wis.2d 313, 317, 404 N.W.2d 109, 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9939 - 2005-03-31