Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 68502 for did.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 68502 for did.
State v. Robert Taylor
there was an alibi witness, Taylor did not receive any robbery proceeds, and the State’s witnesses were lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2291 - 2005-03-31
there was an alibi witness, Taylor did not receive any robbery proceeds, and the State’s witnesses were lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2291 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not reasonable because the officer did not have sufficient articulable facts to form a reasonable belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
was not reasonable because the officer did not have sufficient articulable facts to form a reasonable belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
[PDF]
WI APP 15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
. 2d 246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Farrell
in violation of §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 943.10(1)(a), STATS. Farrell concedes that at the time, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
in violation of §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 943.10(1)(a), STATS. Farrell concedes that at the time, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Wroten
because (1) the circuit court’s plea colloquy did not adequately inform him of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
because (1) the circuit court’s plea colloquy did not adequately inform him of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights was in E.W.P.’s best interests. As the evidence supported the court’s decision, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20
rights was in E.W.P.’s best interests. As the evidence supported the court’s decision, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20