Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 15961 - 15970 of 63986 for records/1000.
State v. Daniel J. Balint
in the record to demonstrate that Balint knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8706 - 2005-03-31
in the record to demonstrate that Balint knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8706 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Debrow
to meet his burden because there is no evidence in the record that the allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13711 - 2005-03-31
to meet his burden because there is no evidence in the record that the allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
to file a response, but she has not done so. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887729 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Flisram
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. NO. 97-1066-CR-NM 2 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. NO. 97-1066-CR-NM 2 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12345 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02
CA Blank Order
review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107724 - 2014-01-30
review of the records, I conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107724 - 2014-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
Wis.2d 412, 426, 415 N.W.2d 535, 541 (Ct. App. 1987), we have carefully reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11795 - 2017-09-21
Wis.2d 412, 426, 415 N.W.2d 535, 541 (Ct. App. 1987), we have carefully reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11795 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601100 - 2022-12-15
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601100 - 2022-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017772 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Debrow
, 401 (1983). Debrow failed to meet his burden because there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13711 - 2014-09-15
, 401 (1983). Debrow failed to meet his burden because there is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13711 - 2014-09-15