Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. James Jagodinsky
), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo appellate review. Cf. Purkett v. Elem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William R. Davis v. Miron Construction Co., Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James A. Kreutz
, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15178 - 2017-09-21
, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38, 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Troy D. Forler
offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15335 - 2017-09-21
offense is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 In determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431613 - 2021-09-29
and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431613 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision not to grant Rogers a Machner 2 evidentiary hearing de novo. State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138975 - 2017-09-21
court’s decision not to grant Rogers a Machner 2 evidentiary hearing de novo. State v. Bentley, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. Whether this right has been denied is a question we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review that issue de novo. Id. ¶6 The first step in the analysis is to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
. We review that issue de novo. Id. ¶6 The first step in the analysis is to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
Robert B. Corris v. Barton Peck
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10
intrusion was “de minimis” because “[t]he driver is being asked to expose to view very little more of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10