Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
Duffey Law Office v. Tank Transport, Inc.
de novo, we give some deference to the trial court's determinations when a conclusion of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31
de novo, we give some deference to the trial court's determinations when a conclusion of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Janusz Daca
. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31
. § 343.305(4) is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Baratka, 2002 WI App 288, ¶7, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31
Terry McGuire v. Richard R. Blank
consider motions for summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. M & I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12435 - 2005-03-31
consider motions for summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. M & I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12435 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kerry A. Jordan
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
Bar Code Resources v. Ameritech Information Systems, Inc.
interpretation and application of the statute is de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13991 - 2005-03-31
interpretation and application of the statute is de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, 111 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 797-98. ¶12 Wisconsin Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 797-98. ¶12 Wisconsin Stat. § 968.24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
John A. P. v. Family Service of Waukesha
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
reasonable conclusion can be drawn, the question is one of law that we review de novo. A conditional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22
the statute applied to Brittany’s claim. ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22