Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 68502 for did.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
happened.[4] On cross-examination, the child testified he did not remember the car trip, did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
happened.[4] On cross-examination, the child testified he did not remember the car trip, did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
. 2d 246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Farrell
in violation of §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 943.10(1)(a), STATS. Farrell concedes that at the time, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
in violation of §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 943.10(1)(a), STATS. Farrell concedes that at the time, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Wroten
because (1) the circuit court’s plea colloquy did not adequately inform him of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
because (1) the circuit court’s plea colloquy did not adequately inform him of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights was in E.W.P.’s best interests. As the evidence supported the court’s decision, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20
rights was in E.W.P.’s best interests. As the evidence supported the court’s decision, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to refresh her job skills, she would receive $1,500 per month during that semester. The judgment did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91724 - 2014-09-15
to refresh her job skills, she would receive $1,500 per month during that semester. The judgment did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91724 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
) his advocate did talk to him; and (3) the only relevant defense he could possibly offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
) his advocate did talk to him; and (3) the only relevant defense he could possibly offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 31, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
their “belief” that Burns-Barr used sophisticated equipment, we concluded that Burns-Barr did not violate Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
their “belief” that Burns-Barr used sophisticated equipment, we concluded that Burns-Barr did not violate Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85608 - 2012-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was justified. However, he argues that the odor of cologne did not give Smith reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12
was justified. However, he argues that the odor of cologne did not give Smith reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35212 - 2009-01-12