Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 68502 for did.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no, but Roman Viera said that if he did not, then Roman Viera would give him a pill. D.L.E. believed the pill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
no, but Roman Viera said that if he did not, then Roman Viera would give him a pill. D.L.E. believed the pill
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
sentence the way that it did. ¶10 In Gerondale, we were asked to reconcile our decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
sentence the way that it did. ¶10 In Gerondale, we were asked to reconcile our decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E.
, Daniel did not appear at the hearing and the juvenile court entered the extension order on January 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16063 - 2017-09-21
, Daniel did not appear at the hearing and the juvenile court entered the extension order on January 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dolores J. Rindahl v. Ralph G. Rindahl
). In this case, the court looked to the judgment of divorce in concluding that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
). In this case, the court looked to the judgment of divorce in concluding that the parties did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10709 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jose Soto
to the two counts of sexual assault of a child at his plea hearing. Soto claims he did so because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
to the two counts of sexual assault of a child at his plea hearing. Soto claims he did so because he felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14353 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Taylor
there was an alibi witness, Taylor did not receive any robbery proceeds, and the State’s witnesses were lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2291 - 2005-03-31
there was an alibi witness, Taylor did not receive any robbery proceeds, and the State’s witnesses were lying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2291 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
did not need a conditional use permit because he was engaged in the permitted use of a warehouse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not reasonable because the officer did not have sufficient articulable facts to form a reasonable belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
was not reasonable because the officer did not have sufficient articulable facts to form a reasonable belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
[PDF]
WI APP 15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19